Sports blogs the way they were meant to be

Sign In

Oye Como Va

Vote 0 Votes

The Twins are openly shopping Johan Santana, the best pitcher in baseball. Doesn’t it stand to reason that the Giants should be able to get a similar return for Matt Cain or Tim Lincecum? Santana2

Here’s why. Santana is expensive. He’ll earn $13 million in 2008 then enter free agency. If his acquirer doesn’t want to extend his contract — which is likely to be more than $20–million-per-year for at least five or six years — they’ll end up trading a package of players for a one-year rental. Extend him with a new contract, and pay top dollar for a pitcher well into his 30s.

If you were a GM, wouldn’t you rather have Matt Cain? He isn’t as good as Santana right now, but he could be in 2009, 2010, and so on… at a much lower price and with less mileage on his arm. If Santana fetches the Twins a package of premium prospects, Brian Sabean’s hand will be greatly strengthened.


P.M. UPDATE: The Twins are close to trading a pitcher, but it’s not Santana. Instead they’re on the verge of trading young starter Matt Garza to the D-Rays for Delmon Young. Four other players could be involved.

What this means for the Giants: The Rays were one of the teams with whom the Giants seemed to match up well trade-wise. I spent my fair share of time wondering which outfielder the Giants could pry loose for Noah Lowry. Matt Cain-for-Carl Crawford has also been a common Internet meme. With the acquisition of Garza and departure of Young, Tampa Bay probably has no more need for what the Giants have.

blog comments powered by Disqus



Header photo courtesy of Flickr user eviltomthai under a Creative Commons license.