+1
I've been posting essentially this since that came out.
The problem is definitely that it was taken out of context. All Sabean really said is that if the Giants could stay close enough in 3rd place, they have a chance. And like Jefferson noted, there are plenty of examples where a team suddenly surged and not just compete but won a division or got in the playoffs.
But the headline Sabean-bashing angle was too juicy to avoid I suppose.
At least Schulman admitted his mistake, the media is pretty bad about doing that, it usually gets buried in the section of the newspaper nobody reads as much, or in small print somewhere when the original mistake was given headline status.
Still, the apology is on his blog, where maybe 0.01% of the people reading the original NEWSPAPER article will see it. If the newspaper had the guts to put it on the front page of the sporting green, then I would be more impressed.
Also, the blog was not really an apology: "I don't think it was a trick question."
It's like the old "Do you still beat your wife?" question. If Sabean is truthful and dismiss our chances, he looks bad and probably gets reprimanded by the owners, but if he states what he did say, he gets beat up too. THAT is the essense of a trick question, the answerer has no way to answer in a way that makes himself look good.
So Mr. Schulman, do you still beat up your significant other?
I was thinking,
"He's like Sabean but with a penchant for bow ties!"