I’ve heard the following hosannas about Matt Cain several times this year, most recently after Cain recovered from a horrendous start in Colorado last week to throw six shutout innings: “He’s becoming a real pitcher.” “This is his breakout year.” “Dark-horse Cy Young.”
The biggest espouser of this line of thought is Mike Krukow, who knows a thing or two about pitching. But Krukow isn’t sanctified gospel. He also said this last week: “The Giants can’t afford to get into a slugfest with the Nationals.”
OK, he was half-right. The Giants didn’t have to outslug the Nats as long as the Nats’ pitching and defense took the field.
But I digress. I want to know this: Should we look at Matt Cain’s shiny precious 2.61 ERA and wonder if the excitement is justified? Among his peripheral stats (walks, Ks, home runs allowed, and average velocity) there are trends worth watching suspiciously. Fantasy geeks who pay little attention beyond the numbers are already panicking:
There are a ton of issues with his season though, starting with his unintentional walk rate, already higher than I was comfortable with, has now shot up to 4.3 per nine. He's striking out one fewer hitter per nine than he did last year, and his velocity appears to be around one mph short of last year's average—which in turn is one mph slower than 2007. He's managed to survive the high number of walks with a bit of luck; Cain has stranded 91 percent of his baserunners (the league average is 71 percent) and he's getting the benefit of a .254 BABIP. That he has stranded so many runners is a mystery as well, given that his homer rate is the highest it has ever been at 1.2 HR/9.
Let’s break some of these down.
4.3 UBB/9: Little good can come of it, to be sure. Cain walked three in the first inning at Coors Field but escaped largely because Todd Helton mis-timed a 3–1 change-up and hit into a double play. Call it a great pitch at the right time, and it was. But it was also luck in the widest of senses: any ball hit, no matter how poorly, can result in a hit. If you give teams free passes, sooner or later a harmless bleeder or blooper will become a damaging hammer blow, which brings us to…
6.63 K/9: That’s still a healthy rate, but as BP’s Marc Normandin notes above, it’s a K lower than last year. Fewer strikeouts mean more balls in play, and please see above about the inevitability of bloopers and bleeders. When unluckiness arrives, it’s better to have a clean slate, but Cain’s walk rate is going in the wrong direction.
Lower fastball velocity: One explanation is that Cain has decided to cut back on velocity to improve his command. So why is he walking more batters this year? And more last year than the year before? And while velocity can be overrated if a pitcher throws his cheese over the meat of the plate, velocity can sometimes help hide mistakes. Randy Johnson should know a little something about this. Let’s ask him: "I don't get away with as many mistakes as I once did.” He said that after the Nationals hit three homers in five innings against him last night.
1.2 HR/9: Speaking of home runs, Cain is allowing a fair number, though three came in his one truly bad start on May 2. In his best years, Curt Schilling preferred to challenge hitters when he had a good lead or with no one on base. If he gave up the occasional homer, it was likely a solo shot. In 2001 he led the league with 37 taters served; he only walked 39. All five of Cain’s surrendered HRs this year have been solo, but with Cain on pace to walk roughly 100 batters, someone’s going to do damage with men on base.
So what gives? Is there a grand mystery behind the discrepancy between Cain’s excellent ERA and his mediocre peripheral skills? If you answer, “He’s finally learning how to win,” you need some remedial spanking.
Maybe the answer is that he’s making key pitches when necessary, hence the high stranded runner rate mentioned above. If so, can we count on him to keep doing it all year? Quite possibly. I’m sure stranger things have happened.
Maybe the answer is that he’s getting better defense this year: the stat called FIP, or fielding-independent pitching, shows he’s nearly a run higher than his career average. Maybe throwing more curves and fewer fastballs has something to do with it.
Maybe the answer is that we’re only six starts into Cain’s 2009 season, and that 32 or 33 starts will be a much better test whether he can strike out fewer, walk more, give up more home runs, and continue to win half his starts with an ERA in the mid-twos.
I’m not saying Cain isn’t a good pitcher. But it seems odd that this, his so-called breakout year, isn’t one of domination but of getting by despite a lot of indicators that he shouldn’t be.
Everything in baseball evens out. Just like Randy Winn was hitting like .220 a week ago, we knew he was going to get hot sooner or later and bring his average closer to the .300 or .290 we all anticipated. The same thing goes for Cain. It is well documented that he has had some of the worst luck in baseball for years now, so finally he is catching some breaks. I think Cain will continue to get better and improve on the weak areas you mentioned leading to even more success without these breaks.
Where's "the love" for Madison Bumgarner after the write up on "the other" Timmy yesterday?
Lefty [HEARTS] MadBum
Ah, I can never resist the temptation of a "whither Matt Cain" discussion. The data on the increased usage of the curve is interesting, Lefty. It seems that he often drops it in to "steal" a strike at the beginning of at-bats, though I don't have the numbers on this.
Back at the end of February, Andy Baggarly reported that the Unit was impressing upon Cain the utility of his splitter to use as a change of pace: http://blogs.mercurynews.com/extrabaggs/2009/02/27/big-unit-shares-secrets-of-his-splitter-with-matt-cain/#more-852
Maybe Cain is looking for the same separation from the velocity of his other pitches, which are all above the mid-80s. I think that most of the peripherals suggest that he hasn't been as good as last year, but, like Ben, I won't be surprised if these improve.
FWIW, I did notice from the fangraphs database that his line-drive % on balls in play is down to around 16% from his mark of 23% last year. Small sample, but that's encouraging.
I look at those two things ( curve ball usage & line drive rate) along with the current crop of umpires (who in my opinion tend to give up on Old Uncle Charlie too soon) and think if Cain keeps doing what he is doing will see a drop in BB as the umps get use to seeing it and then a lower pitch count as hitters start swinging at the curve more often to get it in play.
My biggest single worry about Cain is Big Head just ride him like a rented a mule to the point his arm wears down before he is 26.
It's amazing to find a community as geeky as I am about this stuff.
While we are wondering about MPH on pitches, anyone care to guess how Zito regained 3 - 4 MPH on his fastball this year.
Hmmm. Must be those workouts with Wilson over the offseason
Actually, he gained those extra MPH at the end of last season, which was enough to enable him to finish the season with a great flourish; I think he might have added another 1-2 MPH this year, but I think the results of his work with Wilson this year won't show up until later in the season when he will still be strong relative to other players with lesser staminas.
Yeah, it's interesting how Cain's numbers are all over the place and yet his overall numbers are so good.
I would note that he might be that rare pitcher who don't fall under DIPS spell. He's always been a pitcher who seemed to be able to prevent hits, with his multiple one-hit or low-hit games. That suggests that perhaps he is not one who regresses to the .300 BABIP mean that most pitchers regress to. And thus far in his career, he has been able to do that, except for last year.
In addition, his HR/FB has always been much lower than the 10% mean that most pitchers regress to. This is his first season where that rate is near the mean most pitchers regress to. Previously, he was roughly in the high 6% range. Yet, his ERA is pristine despite the huge uptick in HR and walks.
I would also note that his LD% is actually in line with what he did his first two full seasons of his career, so perhaps he is reverting to a way of pitching he used to do instead of whatever he did last season to achieve what he did. Or, it could have been just one of those odd years in 2008 where he changed nothing and yet his stats were all over the place different.
A big difference this year is the increase in flyballs, which probably contributes greatly to his increase in HR given up.
One thing I would note about his walks comes back to what I wondered about above: is he beyond DIPS? If he is, and is able to sustain a BABIP below average, then a higher walk rate, while not optimum, is not a career killer either, because if he is successful overall, that means that each walk he gives up contributes less offensively than the hits he is preventing with his pitching.
Another thing I would note is that while Cain has classic mid-90's fastballs, he has always appeared to pitch like pitcher who don't have such a good fastball, who has to survive on guile more than overpowering heat. Perhaps he's been pitching like that as long as things are going well, but can go to his fastball when he needs to. He could be pitching to the situation.
I would note two examples of this. Kirk Rueter apparently did this when he was with us. Rob Neyer of ESPN analyzed his pitching and found that depending on the count, Rueter would pitch hitters a certain way depending on the situation with runners on base.
In addition, Ching-Ming Wang of the Yankees apparently actually has a good fastball that he can use to get a strikeout, but most of the time he is satisfied to use his other pitches to get hitters out, compiling hideous K/9 rates that defy explanation for his success so far.
Cain's sterling ERA despite his high HR and walk rate suggests either extreme luck or that he too is pitching to the situation. And that has been true thus far this season, he has been lights out when there are runners on base, it has been when the bases are empty that he has been battered around.
Empty: .312/.391/.506/.897, 4 HR in 77 AB
Men on: .140/.254/.211/.464, 1 HR in 57 AB
RISP: .125/.241/.167/.408, 0 HR in 24 AB
HUGE difference, that's why he has such a high strand rate so far this season.
I've been looking at those same trend lines myself. I think Cain benefits quite a bit from the park--we all know fly balls die in San Francisco. And I think he's been lucky. The drop in strikeouts and the increase in walks can't be good. On the other hand, if he's "pitching smarter" and inducing more ground balls, he'll be effective. My "Cain-dicator" is those ground balls--when he's getting them he is usually very tough. I'm wondering if he needs another pitch, like a sinker, to stay ahead of the league. I also think that he suffers a bit from inflated expectations, perhaps due to his rise to the bigs at such a young age. He's a fine pitcher, a great #2, we're lucky to have him. But pitching alongside Tim Lincecum will make most good pitchers look ordinary.
Listening to Krukow, you can tell he makes his remarks based on what he sees, not from mining stats. It may be that the aggregated stats do not, as some have suggested, show when a pitcher is pitching smarter. I think it likely that these questions will tend to be answered over the course of a season as more data accumulates.
Hey! The season's one-fifth over and the Giants are four games over .500. Who'da thunk it?