Wow, great playoff action! A-Rod punks Joe Nathan, the Angels pitchers shut down the Red Sox, the Rockies make the Phils nervous heading into a frigid Coors Field weekend, and Matt Holliday...
thanks a lot, pal. If this comes down to Dodgers-Rockies for the N.L. pennant, IT'S...ALL...YOUR...FAULT.
Wait a second. Weren't we supposed to know for sure by now about the return of Brian Sabean and Bruce Bochy? It's been four days since their post-season press conference, and still no word on their status. Is anyone else getting a little suspicious? If they don't end up getting re-upped, it'll look bad for our local ink-stained heroes, Baggs and Hank, who both reported from anonymous sources that Boch and Sabes would be back. It also makes you wonder -- who were those anonymous sources? Was it a leak from the Neukom camp? Why would Neukom or someone close to him whisper that info? What kind of negotiating leverage would it give the Giant ownership?
If the leak were from the Bochy/Sabean side, what would be their advantage? Perhaps to put the pressure on Neukom. Either way, these are the questions journalists need to ask when someone whispers in their ears.
Why are you telling me this, and how bad will I look if I publish it and it doesn't come true? That said, my bet is it's all moot in a few days.
I have a few other thoughts on the post-season press conference. Sabean went out of his way to tout a possible leadoff platoon of Eugenio Velez and Andres Torres. Torres against lefties? Sure. The guy earned a spot as a backup outfielder with his work this year,
worth $8.6 million even in abbreviated stints. Love his D, love his baserunning, love his ability to hit the ball hard and run like hell. Even though he's just had his career year and won't likely approach a
.270/.343/.533 line ever again, pencil him in for a roster spot.
Velez? His UZR in LF was
surprisingly high this year, but the small sample size makes me leery. (His defensive numbers at 2B were not surprising. And terrible.) Problem is, he wasn't that good at the plate against anyone this year. He had a hot few games upon recall in July, and that's about it. There is nothing in his game to justify making him the leadoff man in two-thirds of the team's starts. Can he improve? Will Congress see the light and work on a bipartisan basis to make America a better country? Both scenarios are theoretically possible.
The other player who got a lot of air time in the press conference was Freddie Sanchez. Based on Sabean's comments, it will be shocking if Sanchez isn't starting at 2B on Opening Day 2010. Based on his injury history, it will be shocking if he plays more than 120 games in 2010. The Giants probably know this, too, which means Velez has an even wider opening on next year's roster. All of which means that until the front office makes a blockbuster trade or overspends for a big free agent, the 2010 team will rely on improvement from Travis Ishikawa and Nate Schierholtz, a Joe Mauer-like arrival from Buster Posey, a rebound from Aaron Rowand, a miraculously healthy Edgar Renteria, a lot more of the same from Pablo Sandoval, and most importantly, another injury-free campaign from its awesome young pitchers. Now
that is optimism.
Maybe I'm being optimistic, but when Sabes said he would focus on the top of the order (make it more "consistent") I took that to mean he's going to acquire a clean-up hitter. About 20 million is coming off the books (salaries of Winn and Roberts and deferred payments to Bonds), so the money ought to be there for an impact player.
Remember that arbitration rulings for Lincecum, Wilson and J. Sanchez, plus F. Sanchez's option, will probably add *more* than $20 M.
Bonds' defered money does not yet come off the books. Barry's 2002-2006 contract called for five $5M defered payments 2007 thru 2011. Therefore he remains on the books for not just 2010 but 2011 too.
What does come off the books this offseason is Winn's $8,25M, Johnson's $8M, Molina's $6.5M, Roberts' $6.5M, Lowry's $4.5M, Howry's $3.25M, and Aurilia's $1M for a total of $38M. (I am assuming F.Sanchez's team option is exercised or he is signed to and extention and that Uribe is re-signed.)
However, Matt Cain's contract calls for a $1.6M raise, we should expect F.Sanchez and Uribe to cost about $6.4M more then the $3.5M they combined to cost the Giants in 2009, and we should expect that arbitration will award Lincecum/Wilson/J.Sanchez about $14M more then the $1.6M they combined to cost in 2009. These increases will eat up $22M of the above $38M in savings leaving $14M to spend on replacing the production of Johnson/Penny, Winn, Molina, Garko/Aurilia, and Medders/Miller.
With the Addition of $2.5M for F.Sanchez and including Bonds' $5M defered payment the Giants spent $90M on players in 2009. Bottom line, if the Giants are going to get any better in 2010 they will need significant cheap production from Bumgarner, Posey, and their inexpensive outfielders, or they are going to have to spend $100M rather then hold the line at $90M.
Two corrections.
1) $38M minus $22M is $16M not $14M.
2) Howry should have been incuded with Medders and Miller as bullpen production that needs to be replaced.
That's depressing. I thought we were finally going to have some money to spend. I've been defending our "pitching first" philosophy, but we do need someone to bat clean up or at least protect Panda. Don't we?
A great deal of overturn around Sandoval leading to spikes in OBP @ 3-4 positions (theoretically feasible, as several spots were anemic this year) and bouncebacks from Renteria/Rowand could do it.
The way I see it, Neukom has to take his time now that someone leaked it out, to make it look on the up and up and not a rubber stamp.
That's why Sabean had to say that there was no done deal, because there was none yet.
And the leak didn't say there was a done deal, just that Neukom wants them back.
Well, if Neukom wants them back, and Sabean and Bochy wants to be back, well, then it's just a matter of time and negotiation.
Last year's late movement of FAs and the number of non-tendered players could possibly represent a paradigm shift in the collective philosophy of front offices.
Those who rushed to sign FA (i.e., SF with Renteria) got burned in the worst way versus those who were patient (LAA with Abreu).
Based on the information on other websites, it looks like some interesting players could be non-tendered (Connor Jackson, for example).
Have to agree with lefy on Velez. The potions the space aliens gave him did wear out.
Being that a change of scenery can work both ways--good for a struggling player and bad for an overrated player like Rowand--taking a change on some of these players may be smarter than chasing after a 31-year Matt Holliday or Bay, who will want to 5 years from us.
There are a couple of players who could be good contributors on this team--Schierholtz and Garko-- who deserve a serious opportunity, not some b.s. approach where they play for one day and sit for four or more.
If they don't pan out, we move on, but why spend on a player who could end up being the next Aaron Rowand when we COULD have some in-house options?
They only way this can happen is 1) not rehire Bochy, or 2) not give Bochy any more over-paid veterans.
Add Ishikawa, Bowker, and Lewis to your list. Compared to your first two, they are not any worse.
Sanchez' injury history: 2009 was the first year, since he became a regular in 2005, that he played fewer than 130 games. Why should he not return full-force in 2010?
Free agents: impact free agents will demand lengthy contracts, such as Rowand and Zito have; the problem isn't so much overpayment as multi-year drag on improvement.
2 more years apiece for Boch and Sabes, with a club option for 2012. Are you feelin' the love yet? Does Jason Bay turn this team into a World Series contender? Or are we in for 2 more years of Timmy and Cain and try not to go insane?
Not sure the Giants can afford to get into a bidding war with the Sox for Jason Bay, but yeah, I wouldn't mind him roaming left field for the GMen next season.